In tech product management, the emphasis is often on building something new, something better, something that outperforms competitors on a spec sheet. But successful innovation isn’t just about what you build; it’s about how well it fits within the existing ecosystem of workflows, tools, and mental models that customers already rely on.
This idea of "fit" is frequently overshadowed by a fixation on raw technological capability. It’s why so many ambitious products struggle to gain traction despite being functionally superior. The reality is that even the most groundbreaking technology will fail if it asks too much of users in terms of habit-breaking, integration effort, or cognitive overhead.
The Problem of "Too Much Change at Once"
Many failed innovations share a common flaw: they demand that users change too much, too fast. Consider Google Glass—technologically impressive, but a mismatch for social norms and user comfort. Or Microsoft’s first-generation tablets, which attempted to graft a desktop UI onto a touch-based device. The issue wasn’t whether these products could work, but whether they fit how users actually wanted to work.
In contrast, the most successful innovations tend to slot into existing behaviors and environments seamlessly. Slack succeeded not because it invented workplace messaging, but because it fit the rhythms of real-time and asynchronous communication better than email or legacy chat tools. The iPhone, revolutionary as it was, still retained enough familiar elements—touchscreen keyboard, app icons, call functionality—to ease adoption.
The Layers of Fit: Where PMs Should Focus
Understanding fit means looking at multiple layers of how your product will interact with customers' reality:
Workflow Fit – Does your product complement the way teams already work, or does it require an overhaul? Will it create bottlenecks or inefficiencies in their current processes?
Ecosystem Fit – How does your product integrate with the tools customers already depend on? Are there APIs, connectors, or extensions that smooth adoption?
Cognitive Fit – Does the user interface and experience align with users' existing mental models? Are you making them rethink something fundamental in a way that creates friction?
Cultural Fit – Is your product compatible with broader industry norms, professional habits, and unspoken user expectations?
Guidance from Catalytic Customers
So, how do you get fit right? One of the most powerful approaches is engaging deeply with Catalytic Customers—highly engaged, experienced users who are both forward-thinking and deeply embedded in the realities of how products get used in the field. These customers are not just early adopters; they are the bridge between innovation and practical application.
Catalytic Customers can help PMs see beyond the specs and into the lived experience of real users. They can flag points of friction, highlight integration gaps, and validate whether a new product will actually improve workflows or just introduce new complexity. Importantly, they are often the ones who will champion an innovation if it fits well enough to make their own work better.
Fit as a Competitive Advantage
Too many companies operate as if adoption is purely a function of marketing and onboarding. In reality, the best marketing in the world can't fix a product that doesn't fit into users' lives. Tech PMs who prioritize fit—who work with Catalytic Customers to refine usability, interoperability, and workflow alignment—gain a significant edge over competitors.
So, the next time you're evaluating a roadmap decision, don’t just ask, “What does this feature do?” Ask, “How well does this fit?” Because in the end, the best innovation isn't just powerful—it’s effortless to adopt.
Comments